Based on recent experiences, I
noticed two things that seem to make sense until you think about them both
together. Let me explain. In the United States we have health insurance, money
we pay to a company, so that in the event of an illness, that company will
cover our health expenses, which in today’s market can be almost comically
excessive. Given these massive expenses, and that fact that the U.S. economy
profit driven, companies implement different tactics to minimize their costs.
Larger companies are able to negotiate reduced rates on the premise that they
will encourage (read: refuse to pay for otherwise) their insurees to use a
particular product, service, or provider. While perhaps not morally sound, you
have to admit it makes sense from a business stand point. As does a company
implementing a copay system, in which insurees must pay at least some portion
of their health expense. This seems a bit unfair, as the whole point of
insurance is to cover one’s medical costs, but again makes sense economically.
People will take just about anything for free, but put at least a small price
tag on it, and they’ll weigh their options. Of course, this begins to create
problems when the “small” price tag becomes anything but. In summary, people
pay for insurance, which then allows them to pay less for healthcare, but they
still have to pay something.
Now, let’s follow some humans down
on their luck. One was recently laid off of her job due to budget cuts. She
expects to be working again soon, but the next few months will be tight. Another
is a single parent of a young child, below school age, and she can only work
part time as she cannot afford daycare. Another is a young man of twenty-three,
currently working on a master’s degree in laboratory sciences. He is hard
working but puts in fifty hours a week toward his degree. These people are all
incapable of affording health insurance despite being deserving of it. How do
we address this? We have government sponsored healthcare for individuals meeting
certain eligibility criteria. Additionally, such plans usually have either no
copay, or a very minimal copay, as these individuals clearly have financial
barriers. Again, this makes perfect sense. People who deserve healthcare but
cannot afford it for a variety of reasons should not be penalized.
Now here is the part that does not
make sense. Let us say that a particular state offers free healthcare coverage
for individuals making an annual salary of X dollars or less. Individuals
making more than this are expected to obtain their own healthcare, as they can
theoretically afford it. Now, imagine a man making $1000 less than that cutoff,
and who does not qualify for insurance through his employer. He has free
healthcare through the government, and no copay on his medical services and
prescriptions. Next year receives a raise putting him at $500 above the cutoff,
but still does not qualify for insurance through his employer. He now gets to
pay about $300 a month, a copay of about $20 per office visit, about $10 per
month for each medication he takes, as well as a variable deductible that could
be a couple thousand dollars a year. That’s a hell of a raise he got.
No comments:
Post a Comment